Welfare: Who Does It Benefit

What happens if nighone was to lose their assembly line? What happens if in that respect is non enough money at the end of the month? What happens if slightlyone does not have enough money to feed their shaverren? Luckily, in that location is a weapons platform that can back up these people that fit in these categories. The name of this program is called The eudaemonia straighten. Being on eudaemonia is zero point to be ashamed of. Many people feel that welf ar receiptss the poor, except that is not true at all. upbeat benefits those who are in deprivation of it. In todays economy, millions of former CEOs, presidents of companies, and business owners are respectable away suffering severe pay cuts.Now, they may not be fitting support their families financially like they use to. They might have to resign to beingness on welfare to help their families. This example shows that welfare not only helps the less fortunate, just it helps e rattlingone in need. My primary boil down of this opus is to illustrate how welfare helps everyone, and it is nothing to be embarrassed near. social welfare disentangle The Untold Story was a very informative condition virtually the use of the welfare reform. This member discussed the problems with the welfare legislation.It negotiation slightly how some people are abusing the welfare dodge. Also, it talks about how the welfare system has helped former(a) major programs. A program that has been helped by the Welfare crystalise is the funding of child care. It talks about what prompted the need of the Welfare cleanse. It provides entropy on how long people are usually on welfare. The article talks about how minimum wage, child support, and a rise in income tax credit have benefited the people on welfare. The article excessively explains why numerous people on welfare got off the program.It talks about how welfare has affected teen pregnancy. Finally, it gives the reader the advantages and disadvan tages brought by the Welfare Reform. Robert Cherry state that, But the strong economy and funding victuals of welfare legislation led almost all states to enhance child care funding, provide tax subsidies to supplement wages, and to fund educational initiatives (Cherry 79). In this statement alone can answer my soul think of the paper. That purpose was does the Welfare Reform benefit the poor? This statement gives the answer as yes, but while doing so the WelfareReform has helped millions of people who are not poor. some other enceinte point Robert Cherry made was, During the economic expansion, the vast majority of welfare leavers found p maintenance employment (Cherry 81). This explains, while the economy is doing great there are numerous people that are on welfare who are getting off. To go a little further, if the economy is not doing well, this is what caused people to turn towards welfare. Once again, this has back up the idea that welfare does not just benefit the less fortunate. Has the Welfare Reform benefited the poor?Yes, but while the reform was geared toward the people who fit the poor profile, however, it has benefited the very people who look down on welfare. Single shapeing mothers are a group that does not fit the poor profile, but the Welfare Reform has helped them tremendously. Robert Cherry supported my claim by saying, Today, if a integrity mother with two children earns $13,000, she qualifies for an earned income tax credit (EITC) of $4,000 at the national level, and $900 at the state level in a number of states(Cherry 81). With the tax credit, which is a part of the Welfare Reform their yearly income has risen to all over $ 17,000.The book Evaluating Food avail Programs in an Era of Welfare Reform Summary of a Workshop gives information that numerous Americans do not know about. The book talks about the disparate programs that are at heart the Welfare Reform. It too talks about the work requirements that come with being o n welfare. It in any case discusses the coin that are set aside for welfare. To clarify on the different programs, the book not only gives us the call of the program, but the book goes in detail pertaining to the programs. The book talks about the research that was needed, so that there could be improvements for welfare.The editors discussed a program called the personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. PRWORA emphasizes welfare to work concept, including conviction limits for supporter, strong work requirements, a performance bonus to reward states for despicable welfare recipients into jobs, and increased funding for child care (Evaluating vii). This shows that welfare does not mean taking care of lazy people. It is also saying that the states would benefit from those on welfare. This program gears to help people work, and to take care of themselves, so that is why there is a limit for assistance.The Food and Nutrition returns serves an enormous part to the Welfare Reform. The editors stated, Today, the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) of the U. S. plane section of Agriculture (USDA) administers 15 food assistance programs. These programs feed one in six Americans, serving as a natural nutrition sanctuary net for millions of children, working families, and elderly (Evaluating 1). This material proves that people, who work still, need some assistance. It shows that this program feeds not only the less fortune, but it feeds working Americans also.It also shows that welfare knows no upper, middle, or lower class, but it helps Americans as a whole. I know there has been a previous attempt to help people in need, but that did not work because how the money was distributed to the families. The editors supported my claim by saying, The previous program, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), provided change assistance directly to children and their families based on need, income, resources, family size, and family structur e (Evaluating 1). The problem with this program was because the cash was given directly to the families.This maybe the reason why many Americans started to accept welfare was a waste of money, and the money was not used for the right reasons. This also caused them to use stricter requirements, and caused PRWORA to come up with something else to replace the flaws. PRWORA replaced AFDC with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, which provides assistance and work opportunities to needy families by granting states the federal funds and wide flexibility to develop and implement their own welfare program (Evaluating 1).The article Welfare Reform and Family Expenditures How Are Single Mothers Adapting to the New Welfare and Work Regime provided information that I did not know. The article talks about the public welfare. It also put a light on single parents, but mainly the focus is on single mothers. The article gives graphs that illustrate single mother families, wh ich the mother only has, a amply school diploma. The graph also showed what kind of income was expected, depending on the other levels of education. The article also displays the xpenses of the needs needed in everyday life. The article also gives the reader a descriptive and multivariate analysis about expenditures. The authors stated that, According to the U. S. Census Bureau (nd), the leanness rate among children in single-mother families declined from 54 percent in 1993 to 43 percent in 2005. This decline is overdue part to the economic boom of the 1900s and in part to such other factors as changes in tax and transfers programs (Welfare Reform 371). This shows that while the economy is doing well, the poverty rate drops.This also shows that just because someone is living in a single parent home it does not mean that they will be living inn poverty. I truly call up that the Welfare Reform does not encourage the welfare recipients to be on welfare. The authors supported my te aching by saying, A spate of policy changes in the 1990s shifted the focus of U. S. welfare policy from providing cash benefits for low-income single mothers to providing work incentives, and a stretch of supports for the working poor (Welfare Reform 371).The government knows that life can be hard, and that is why the government created the Welfare Reform. The government encourages people to work, and to look for jobs. That is why government is making the attempt to provide help for those who need it. However, there is another side to the story. Receivers of welfare as a child has a negative outcome on the money earned as adults. mess believe that the more welfare a young male receives as a child, the lower the same boy income will be as an adult.Living in a single-parent household while on welfare, the more believably a person is to have a criminal record. Also, many believe that children in households with higher income will do better in life. almost Americans believe that wel fare encourages illegitimacy, and reducing illegitimacy is a more authoritative goal in the Welfare Reform, than attempting to make single mothers self-sufficient. It has been said that modern font welfare is deeply flawed and misleading, and has become a recipe for a disastrous system of aid which harms rather than helps.Many believe that welfare reduces the work effort, promotes illegitimacy, and poverty prone single parent families. There are advantages and disadvantages about the Welfare Reform, but I truly believe that the good outdo the bad. Millions have moved from welfare to work, and this absolute proof that welfare whole caboodle for the better. But some critics does not believe that because they say a apportion less people are receiving cash benefits, but a smokestack more have signed up for other programs, including food stamps, Medicaid, and deterrent benefits.Being on welfare does not determine what you will become in life. The Welfare Reform provides too many ben efits for everyone however, it is looked down by many of critics. Being realistic, everyone does not graduate from high school and college, for many different reasons however, they do not need to suffer for that. Welfare is essential for providing aid for children. The true beneficiary of the Welfare reform is not the poor, but it is the children of America.